Since Wednesday's action alert about the "Farm Store" bill I've been keeping tabs on the testimony submitted for HB 4153. Our little community might be small, but dang if it ain't MIGHTY!
Over 62% of the testimony submitted so far is in opposition to the bill with close to 1000 testimonies submitted from around the state. That's a lot of Oregonians voicing their opinion, but most strikingly a very large percentage of those testimonies have come from the Southcoast: Gold Beach, Port Orford, Langlois, Bandon, Coos Bay, Coquille. Our peeps!
Thank you so much for springing into action - swiftly and in amazing numbers - to oppose this bill! It's making a difference in Salem.
So much so that our state Senator and co-sponsor of the bill, David Brock Smith, called me yesterday in hopes of changing my mind about HB 4153 (and yours as well). But the more I've learned about HB 4153 - and I've been doing some homework the past couple days :) - the more this is clear: while the bill is sure to benefit some large-scale agritourism operations who want to expand their music venue or sell more donuts, it will simultaneously kill most of our local, family-run farmstands - Crooked Creek, Wildwoods Gypsy, Hartnell Haven and others up and down the coast who are feeding our community and making life here on the Southcoast more awesome. It could also inadvertently drive up the price of farmland as big parcels are purchased for lucrative agritourism enterprises rather than the agricultural production of food, fiber and forage.
Senator Brock Smith insisted to me that this bill would actually help Valley Flora because we are just big enough to meet the acreage/sales requirements specified in the bill. But the fact is, it'd be at the expense of our farming friends and neighbors and that's simply not OK. We're in this to build a strong food system on the Southcoast - to grow real food for real families - and we're driven by a set of core values: to tend the land and feed our community with care, and to make the world a healthier, more connected, resilient, just and vibrant place. The more of us who share that ethos - farmers and eaters alike - the more the vision becomes real. We're stronger together.
So no, Senator Smith, I do not want to benefit from a bill that will put other small farmers out of business. And no, Senator Smith, I do not support a bill that will undermine the visionary land use laws that have protected and supported Oregon agriculture for over 50 years. HB 4153 is not the answer.
If you have not submitted testimony yet, we have until 1 pm TOMORROW (Friday, February 6th) to do so. Also please consider reaching out to Senator David Brock Smith directly to share your thoughts about his bill: Sen.DavidBrockSmith@oregonlegislature.gov
They're listening in Salem right now, so thanks to everyone for speaking up!
Once again, here's a template and instructions for submitting testimony:
Testimony Information for HB 4153
HB 4153 is not good for small farms - speak up to demand a better solution for Oregon’s farm stands. This bill contains a provision that states that a parcel zoned EFU (exclusive farm use) for Farm and Forest use cannot have a farmstand unless:
- The parcel is 80 acres or more and has at least 45 acres in production
- The parcel is 40-79.99 acres and has at least 25 acres in production
- The parcel is 20-39.99 acres and has at least 15 acres in production
- Is less than 20 acres and either
- Has at least 10 acres in production, or
- Has cumulative gross sales of at least
- $40,000 (in the current text) or
- $10,000 (in the proposed amendments -1, and -2) from farm products in the last 2 years.
This would close existing farm stands who are following the law right now but are too small to meet these requirements. This bill replaces all current language around farmstands implying that folks with an honor system stand at the end of their driveway supplied with garden overflow (zucchinis in August, a couple pints of berries, or a sign saying eggs $6!) would be outlawed by this approach. Why are we giving more privileges to large land owners and telling small operations that they are not allowed to have a farmstand?
Limiting who is allowed to participate in farm stands/stores because of their size is counter to the spirit of community food systems. Why are we penalizing small farmers for not being able to afford more land, being early on in their farm business journey, or telling folks that they aren’t allowed to gather the community at their farm because they are small?
Join us to oppose HB 4153 and demand a more inclusive solution. Oregon communities love their small, homegrown farmstands and we don’t want to sacrifice them for the ability of a few larger land owners to host more events. A solution for Oregon’s farm stands should uplift us all.
Testimony Instructions - DEADLINE 2/6/26 @ 1PM
Here is how you submit written testimony:
- Go to this link
- Select HB 4153
- Enter your information
- Select OPPOSE on the position on this measure
- Feel free to use the template below to write up your statement. You can either copy and paste it into the text box, or make a copy and download it as a PDF to submit.
PLEASE CUSTOMIZE THIS TEMPLATE IN THE FIELDS MARKED IN YELLOW! Testimony that includes your personal story is much more effective than a boiler plate statement. Tell these legislators how you feel!
*************************************************************************************************************
Co-Chairs Helm and Owens, Vice-Chair Finger McDonald, and members of the House Committee on Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources, and Water:
My Name is NAME and I am a FARMER/RANCHER/COMMUNITY MEMBER/FARM STAND OPERATOR in TOWN. I am writing to you today to express my opposition to HB 4153. Farm stands are a vital part of connecting the public with our food system and building an understanding of what it takes to go from field to fork. But HB 4153 would restrict who is allowed to have a farm stand, replace current definitions with Farm Stores, and give large land owners privileges at the expense of small farm stands in Oregon. We need to find a better solution.
I care about this because.....
Consider answering some of these questions or using these statements as a jumping off point in your testimony:
I operate or frequently go to a farm stand that would not meet the acreage requirements in section 2.2 of the bill.
Small farms need to have the same opportunities to sell their produce as larger farms.
Why is small farming important to you? What is the value of small operations in your community?
Why should large acreage farmers gain privileges at the expense of smaller acre farmers?
Why should a small farm be any less legitimate than a large farm when it comes to defining farm use?
What do farm stands do for your farm business or community?
What does it mean for you, your farm and your community if the primary purpose of a farm stand becomes agritourism events, not the sale of farm products?
We are asking you to not place a higher burden on the smallest farms. This bill takes away opportunities from small land holders and farms in order for larger operations to be able to host more events. This is not a good bargain for Oregon and a better deal must be found.
Thank you,
NAME
ADDRESS